Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology
Identifieur interne : 000757 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000756; suivant : 000758Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology
Auteurs : Philip J. Seddon [Nouvelle-Zélande] ; Doug P. Armstrong [Nouvelle-Zélande] ; Richard F. Maloney [Nouvelle-Zélande]Source :
- Conservation Biology [ 0888-8892 ] ; 2007-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Abstract: With recent increases in the numbers of species reintroduction projects and reintroduction‐related publications, there is now a recognizable field of reintroduction biology. Nevertheless, research thus far has been fragmented and ad hoc, rather than an organized attempt to gain reliable knowledge to improve reintroduction success. We reviewed 454 recent (1990–2005) peer‐reviewed papers dealing with wildlife reintroductions from 101 journals. Most research has been retrospective, either opportunistic evaluations of techniques or general project summaries, and most inference is gained from post hoc interpretation of monitoring results on a species‐by‐species basis. Documentation of reintroduction outcomes has improved, however, and the derivation of more general principles via meta‐analyses is expected to increase. The fragmentation of the reintroduction literature remains an obstacle. There is scope to improve reintroduction biology by greater application of the hypothetico‐deductive method, particularly through the use of modeling approaches and well‐designed experiments. Examples of fruitful approaches in reintroduction research include experimental studies to improve outcomes from the release of captive‐bred animals, use of simulation modeling to identify factors affecting the viability of reintroduced populations, and the application of spatially explicit models to plan for and evaluate reintroductions. We recommend that researchers contemplating future reintroductions carefully determine a priori the specific goals, overall ecological purpose, and inherent technical and biological limitations of a given reintroduction and that evaluation processes incorporate both experimental and modeling approaches. We suggest that the best progress will be made when multidisciplinary teams of resource managers and scientists work in close collaboration and when results from comparative analyses, experiments, and modeling are combined within and among studies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001430
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001429
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000444
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000772
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000757
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology</title><author><name sortKey="Seddon, Philip J" sort="Seddon, Philip J" uniqKey="Seddon P" first="Philip J." last="Seddon">Philip J. Seddon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Armstrong, Doug P" sort="Armstrong, Doug P" uniqKey="Armstrong D" first="Doug P." last="Armstrong">Doug P. Armstrong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Maloney, Richard F" sort="Maloney, Richard F" uniqKey="Maloney R" first="Richard F." last="Maloney">Richard F. Maloney</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D2A88480EA6CD5EB7DE8175D586C0A980386A7E1</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A88480EA6CD5EB7DE8175D586C0A980386A7E1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001430</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001430</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001429</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000444</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000444</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0888-8892:2007:Seddon P:developing:the:science</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000772</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000757</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000757</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology</title><author><name sortKey="Seddon, Philip J" sort="Seddon, Philip J" uniqKey="Seddon P" first="Philip J." last="Seddon">Philip J. Seddon</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Nouvelle-Zélande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>New Zealand</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Armstrong, Doug P" sort="Armstrong, Doug P" uniqKey="Armstrong D" first="Doug P." last="Armstrong">Doug P. Armstrong</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Nouvelle-Zélande</country><wicri:regionArea>Wildlife Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Palmerston North</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Palmerston North</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maloney, Richard F" sort="Maloney, Richard F" uniqKey="Maloney R" first="Richard F." last="Maloney">Richard F. Maloney</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Nouvelle-Zélande</country><wicri:regionArea>Research, Development and Improvement Division, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 13049, Christchurch</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Christchurch</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Conservation Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno><idno type="eISSN">1523-1739</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-04">2007-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="303">303</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="312">312</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno></series><idno type="istex">D2A88480EA6CD5EB7DE8175D586C0A980386A7E1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">COBI627</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>biología de la reintroducción</term><term>conocimiento confiable</term><term>gestión</term><term>management</term><term>population restoration</term><term>recuperación de especies</term><term>reintroduction biology</term><term>reliable knowledge</term><term>restauración de la población</term><term>species recovery</term><term>translocación</term><term>translocation</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: With recent increases in the numbers of species reintroduction projects and reintroduction‐related publications, there is now a recognizable field of reintroduction biology. Nevertheless, research thus far has been fragmented and ad hoc, rather than an organized attempt to gain reliable knowledge to improve reintroduction success. We reviewed 454 recent (1990–2005) peer‐reviewed papers dealing with wildlife reintroductions from 101 journals. Most research has been retrospective, either opportunistic evaluations of techniques or general project summaries, and most inference is gained from post hoc interpretation of monitoring results on a species‐by‐species basis. Documentation of reintroduction outcomes has improved, however, and the derivation of more general principles via meta‐analyses is expected to increase. The fragmentation of the reintroduction literature remains an obstacle. There is scope to improve reintroduction biology by greater application of the hypothetico‐deductive method, particularly through the use of modeling approaches and well‐designed experiments. Examples of fruitful approaches in reintroduction research include experimental studies to improve outcomes from the release of captive‐bred animals, use of simulation modeling to identify factors affecting the viability of reintroduced populations, and the application of spatially explicit models to plan for and evaluate reintroductions. We recommend that researchers contemplating future reintroductions carefully determine a priori the specific goals, overall ecological purpose, and inherent technical and biological limitations of a given reintroduction and that evaluation processes incorporate both experimental and modeling approaches. We suggest that the best progress will be made when multidisciplinary teams of resource managers and scientists work in close collaboration and when results from comparative analyses, experiments, and modeling are combined within and among studies.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Nouvelle-Zélande</li></country></list><tree><country name="Nouvelle-Zélande"><noRegion><name sortKey="Seddon, Philip J" sort="Seddon, Philip J" uniqKey="Seddon P" first="Philip J." last="Seddon">Philip J. Seddon</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Armstrong, Doug P" sort="Armstrong, Doug P" uniqKey="Armstrong D" first="Doug P." last="Armstrong">Doug P. Armstrong</name><name sortKey="Maloney, Richard F" sort="Maloney, Richard F" uniqKey="Maloney R" first="Richard F." last="Maloney">Richard F. Maloney</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/RenardV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000757 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000757 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= RenardV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D2A88480EA6CD5EB7DE8175D586C0A980386A7E1
|texte= Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |